Detroit Industrial Tool Better Tools for Best Results
HomeAbout UsNews/EventsContact Us
PRODUCTS
AFFILIATES
HELPFUL TIPS
 
 

HELPFUL TIPS

What to Consider When Thinking About Solid Carbide End Mill Machining

One of the most confusing aspects about solid carbide end mills is the selection of many types of geometries and coatings. By understanding what geometries and coatings can or cannot do makes selection as easy as one, two, and three. When first deciding which end mill to use, thoroughly evaluate the operation along with the material that needs to be employed to get the desired shape needed. The next step is deciding what geometry will work best.

General Rules
For example when doing a slotting operation, unless doing a light cut of about .2D or less, it is best to use a two or three fluted end mill. The general rule is use less flutes for deeper cuts. The reason for this is the vulnerability of chip packing that can lead to destruction of the end mill. If the machine and program have the ability to trochoid mill, a method which is done by engaging circular arcs using an end mill smaller that the slot width, a larger number of flutes can be employed. Since the end mill is basically periphery cutting, less heat and forces allow for longer tool life, higher tolerance finishes and increased production over the same amount of time it would take the conventional method. When a periphery cut or side mill operation is part of the application and metal removal is of concern, employ a larger number fluted end mill with four, six, even eight teeth. Of course, once again, the radial and axial depths of cut have a factor in how many teeth to use effectively.

Machining Material
Also, the material machined must be understood. Since 1018 carbon steel and D2 tool steel don’t have the same machining qualities, a different approach must be taken for each. Most end mills will perform just fine for the 1018 with any number of flutes. With harder materials, such as D2 (58 HRc), more flutes, lighter cuts and less speed must be used. The reason for ore flutes is because of the lighter feed rates and the need to keep production levels high. Also, as the strength of an end mill increases due to a larger core which helps to decrease tool deflection, different approaches for stainless steels must be used because stainless materials tend to work harder if the feed rate is too low. In aluminum with low silicon percentage (under 5%), the material can be a bit gummy leading to build-up edge so high speeds and feeds need to be used to keep the chips evacuating from the flutes. As you can see, the material being used is a dominant factor when deciding speed and feed for all applications. Another consideration is the helix angle of the end mill. It is generally accepted that a 30ºangle is industry standard for sharpness and cutting edge strength. This is adequate for carbon steels, some tools steels or even light finishing passes in aluminum. However, when machining stainless steels, a sharper cutting edge needs to be employed as to lessen the work-hardening effects and promote a more free cutting action. This where a 45ºhelix angle does well because there will be some cutting edge strength along with the appropriate sharpness needed. This angle also is good for aluminum when engaging in a deeper slot or periphery cut.

When machining Inconel or other difficult-to-cut materials, a 60ºhelix needs to be employed. The shearing action is greater, but the tooth edge integrity becomes less. One might think that a weaker cutting edge could cause problems for these materials, but since the feed rates must be kept low, the cutting forces are low enough to maintain cutting edge integrity. Additionally, it might be considered that a sixty-degree angle would be even better for aluminum. That is not the case as the chip flow is not very good because of aluminum’s gummy properties and the fact that the end mill must be run at a high sfm to be effective in cutting aluminum. That combination of speed and the helix angle for this material does not allow for proper chip evacuation.

Consider Coatings
Now, a very important process that allows the carbide end mill to resist wear is the coating. Although solid carbide end mills perform better and last longer in most applications when compared with high-speed steel, heat is not carbide’s friend. In the last decade, the technology to provide more heat and wear-resistant coatings has promoted longer tool life and increased productivity. There are three major types of coatings that are being used today: TiN (Titanium Nitride), TiCN (Titanium Carbon Nitride) and the increasingly popular TiAIN (Titanium Aluminum Nitride) or ALTIN (Aluminum Titanium Nitride)-the latter having more aluminum content. Other coatings exist but they are usually offshoots of these three. All of these coatings provide a benefit, but that benefit can only be realized when dealing with specific applications and materials.

TiN-coated end mills should be run at close to uncoated speeds and feeds. The benefit here is much better wear and lubricity. TiCN is a great coating where slow feeds and speeds are used because of machine constraints. It’s often the coating of choice for high-speed steel end mills, but in carbide you can run it at least 80% faster speed against uncoated solid carbide end mills. The only downfall with TiCN is that it’s more prone to failure under extreme heat; hence, it’s use in slower feed and speed applications.

The coatings that are becoming more and more popular are the TiAIN or ALTIN- coated end mills. They are so effective with dissipating heat into the chips that dry machining is mostly recommended, except when slotting where the chips need to be expelled out of the channel. The aluminum in the coating helps form a gaseous aluminum oxide layer at the cutting edge where temperatures can reach more than 1800ºF. This helps protect the carbide substrate from the damaging effects of heat. That’s what makes this coating ideal for high-speed and hard milling, especially in dry cutting. For machining aluminum, brass, plastics and other nonferrous materials it is best to use a non-coated end mill with polished flutes to prevent edge buildup. This is due to the fact that coated end mills don’t allow as sharp an edge needed for these materials.

These are just a few of the factors that lead to productive and consistent solid carbide milling. Other elements that may influence machining could be specific geometries of the end mill that may include certain rake angles, gash lands, relief angles, etc. In addition, the machine, program and stability issues with tool or work piece setups must be considered. Knowing the basics of geometries and coatings and understanding what they can and cannot do is the first step to helping you decide which end mill should perform best for your application.

P.J. Agnew
Mitsubishi Materials USA Corp

Problem Solving Guide

Symptom Possible Cause Possible Solution
Rough Finish Dull cutting edge Re-sharpen to orginal tool geometry.
  Wrong feeds and speeds Increae speed. Also try reducing feed.
Excessive cutting edge wear Wrong feeds and speeds Increae speed (should always be over .001" per tooth) - especially when machining ductile or free machining materials. Also try reducing speed.
  Rough cutting edge Lightly hone cutting edge with fine grit diamond hone.
  Insufficient coolant Increase coolant flow-review type of coolant
Chipped cutting edge Poor chip removal Use tool with larger flute space, larger diameter or fewer flutes
  Recutting work hardened chips Increase coolant flow
  Vibration Increase rigidity of set-up, especially worn tool holders
  Incorrect carbide grade Change to tougher carbide grade
Chatter Marks Insufficient machine horse power Use tool with fewer flutes as correct speeds and feeds must be maintained
  Vibration Consider Climb Milling
    Use larger diameter cutter
    Re-sharpen tool with more clearance
Glazed finish Feed too light Increase feed
  Dull cutting edge Resharpen tool to original geometry
  Insufficient clearance Resharpen tool with more clearance
Poor tool life Excessive cratering Increase speed or decrease feed
    Change to harder grade carbide
  Milling abrasive material Decrease speed and increase feed
    Increase coolant flow
    Climb milling better than conventional milling
  Milling surface scale Conventional milling better than climb milling
  Milling hard material Reduce speed - rigidity is very important
  Insufficient chip room Use larger diameter tool
  Delayed resharpening Prompt resharpening to original geometry will increase total tool life
  Thermal cracked carbide Increase coolant flow at all times

Speed Feed Specs

Carbide End Mills

Material Speed End Mill Diameter Feed Per Tooth (inches)
  (SFM) Up to 1/4" Up to 1/2" Up to 1"
Aluminum / Aluminum Alloys 600-1300 .0002 - .002 .002 - .004 .004 - .008
Brass / Soft Bronze 400-700 .0005 - .002 .002 - .003 .003 - .005
Bronze / High Tensile 250-400 .001 - .002 .002 - .003 .004 - .006
Copper / Copper Alloys 350-900 .0005 - .002 0.002 .002 - .006
Iron-Cast (Soft) 200-500 .0005 - .002 .002 - .003 .003 - .008
Iron-Cast (Hard) 100-450 .0003 - .001 .0006 - .002 .003 - .005
Iron-Ductile 80-400 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .006
Iron-Malleable 250-600 .001 - .002 .001 - .003 .003 - .008
Magnesium / Mag. Alloys 800-1400 .0005 - .002 .002 - .004 .004 - .010
Molybdenium 800-1100 .001 - .002 .002 - .004 .004 - .008
Monel / High Nickel Steel 150-300 .0002- .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .004
Nickel Base Hi-Temp Alloys 20-130 .0003 - .0008 .0008 - .001 .001 - .002
Plastics 600-1200 .0006 - .003 .003 -.006 .006 - .015
Plastics-Glass Filled 300-800 .0006 - .003 .003 - .004 .004 - .012
Refractory Alloys 80-400 .0002 - .001 0.001 .001 - .022
Steel Carbon 250-550 .0002 - .001 .001 - .003 .003 - .007
Steel-Medium Carbon 100-250 .0004 - .0015 .0015 - .002 .002 - .005
Steel Up to Rc 35 150-250 .0005 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .003
Steel Rc 35-Rc 50 80-150 .0003 - .0007 .0007 - .001 .002 - .003
Steel Rc 50-Rc 60 25-120 .0002 - .0005 .0005 - .001 .001 - .003
Steel-Mold 200-350 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .006
Steel-Tool 100-300 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - 006
Stainless Steel-Soft 250-400 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .006
Stainless Steel-Hard 50-250 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .001 - .005
Titanium-Soft 120-350 .0002 - .001 .001 - .002 .002 - .006
Titanium-Hard 30-150 .0002 - .0005 .0005 - .001 .001 - .004
Plunge Operators reduce feed per tooth 50 - 60%
Slotting Applications surface sppeds (sfm), should be reduced approximately 20% of the lowest value
Light Radial Depths of cut, the higher of the recommended surface sppeds (sfm) should be used.
Greater Radial Depths of cut (more than .5 x diameter), the lower range of surface speeds (sfm) should be used
Axial Depth of Cut Recommendations are not to exceed 1-1/2 times the diameter. If this condition exists, then Conventional Milling should be used and feed per tooth should be reduced by 50%
Please Note: The above recommendations should be considered only as a starting point; "fine tuning" may be required in order to maximize performance.
 
RPM = 3.82 x (SFM / Dia.)   SFM = .262 x Dia. X RPM
ipm = ipt x #teeth x RPM   ipt = ipm / (RPM x # teeth)
ipm: inches per minute ipt: inches per tooth

Threadmills - Speeds/Feeds & Feedrate Adjustment

Workpiece Material Speed Feedrate (inches/tooth) per cutting tool diameter
  (SFM) 1/8 3/16 1/4 5/16 3/8 1/2 5/8
Aluminum 800-1400 .0005-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0045 .0035-.0055 .0050-.0070
Magnesium 800-1400 .0005-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0045 .0035-.0055 .0050-.0070
Brass 600-800 .0005-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0045 .0035-.0045 .0050-.0060
Bronze 500-600 .0005-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0045 .0035-.0045 .0050-.0060
Hard Bronze 200-300 .0004-.0008 .0007-.0012 .0010-.0020 .0010-.0020 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0040
Low Alloy Steel <25RC 350-500 .0005-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0025-.0035 .0030-.0040 .0040-.0050
High Alloy Steel >25RC 250-400 .0003-.0006 .0005-.0010 .0008-.0015 .0010-.0020 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0040
Stainless 150-250 .0004-.0008 .0006-.0010 .0010-.0015 .0015-.0020 .0015-.0030 .0020-.0035 .0030-.0040
Cast Iron - Soft 250-350 .0004-.0008 .0007-.0013 .0007-.0013 .0015-.0020 .0020-.0030 .0020-.0040 .0030-.0050
Cast Iron - Hard 200-300 .0003-.0006 .0005-.0010 .0008-.0015 .0010-.0020 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030 .0030-.0040
Titanium 80-150 .0003-.0006 .0005-.0010 .0008-.0015 .0010-.0020 .0015-.0025 .0015-.0025 .0025-.0035
Inconel 60-100 .0003-.0006 .0005-.0010 .0008-.0015 .0010-.0020 .0015-.0025 .0015-.0025 .0020-.0030

Drills - Speeds/Feeds

Workpiece Material Speed Feed Per Tooth (F.P.T.)
  (SFM) 1/16 1/8 1/4 1/2
Aluminum/Aluminum Alloys 250-650 0.0010 0.0030 0.0070 0.0120
Brass 250 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040
Bronze 150 0.0007 0.0020 0.0030 0.0040
Copper/Copper Alloys 150-250 0.0010 0.0030 0.0060 0.0100
Cast Iron - Soft 200-300 0.0010 0.0030 0.0060 0.0120
Cast Iron - Hard 85-200 0.0005 0.0020 0.0040 0.0070
Malleable Iron 300-350 0.0010 0.0020 0.0040 0.0070
Magnesium/Magnesium Alloys 75-150 0.0010 0.0030 0.0070 0.0120
Morel/High Nickel Steel 150-450 0.0010 0.0030 0.0050 0.0900
Plastic 85-175 0.0010 0.0020 0.0040 0.0050
Steel - Mild (Medium Carbon) 50-100 0.0010 0.0020 0.0040 0.0070
Tool Steels 85-100 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0060
High tensil (40-45RC) 225 0.0010 0.0020 0.0030 0.0060
High tensil (45-50RC) 90 0.0007 0.0010 0.0020 0.0020
High tensil (50-55RC) 85 0.0005 0.0007 0.0010 0.0010
Stainless Steel - Free Machining 85-300 0.0010 0.0030 0.0050 0.0080
Work Hardening 50-100 0.0005 0.0020 0.0040 0.0060
Titantium 85-350 0.0010 0.0020 0.0040 0.0060
Detroit Industrial Tool :: 15222 Keswick Street :: Van Nuys, CA 91405 :: Phone: 800.678.8006 :: Fax: 818.988.9206 :: sales@ditool.com
A Division of Mared Industries :: 10607 W. Oklahoma Avenue :: West Allis, WI 53227
Frequent Buyer Program